Editorial Policies

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every single contribution submitted to The Conference will be sent to one reviewer, though usually could be sent to two or more independent reviewers, selected by the editors and sometimes by more if further advice is required (e.g., on statistics or on a particular technique). Authors are welcome to suggest suitable independent reviewers and may also request the journal to exclude certain individuals or laboratories.

The primary purpose of the review is to provide the editors with the information necessary to make a decision. The review should also instruct the authors on how to strengthen their paper up to the point where it should be acceptable. A negative review should explain to the authors the weaknesses of their manuscript, so that rejected authors are able to understand the basis for the decision and see, in broad terms, what needs to be done to improve the manuscript in order to be published anywhere.

 

Open Access Policy

This Conference site provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge, but required to include reference to cited materials from the Conference site.

 


 

 

 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE ORGANIZING COMMITEE,

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING INSTITUTE,

KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY.